sexta-feira, 9 de dezembro de 2016

WE, COURAGEOUS LATIN AMERICAN DEPLORABLES DEMONSTRATORS FOR TRUMP (SÃO PAULO, BRAZIL), CONGRATULATE HIM FOR FOR 2016 TIME’S PERSON OF THE YEAR

WE, COURAGEOUS LATIN AMERICAN DEPLORABLES DEMONSTRATORS FOR TRUMP (SÃO PAULO, BRAZIL), CONGRATULATE HIM FOR FOR 2016 TIME’S PERSON OF THE YEAR
SOURCE/LINK: http://time.com/time-person-of-the-year-2016-donald-trump/



BY MICHAEL SCHERER
PHOTOGRAPHS BY NADAV KANDER FOR TIME
Even for Donald Trump, the distance is still fun to think about, up here in his penthouse 600 ft. in the sky, where it’s hard to make out the regular people below. The ice skaters swarming Central Park’s Wollman Rink look like old-television static, and the Fifth Avenue holiday shoppers could be mites in a gutter. To even see this view, elevator operators, who spend their days standing in place, must push a button marked 66–68, announcing all three floors of Trump’s princely pad. Inside, staff members wear cloth slipcovers on their shoes, so as not to scuff the shiny marble or stain the plush cream carpets.
This is, in short, not a natural place to refine the common touch. It’s gilded and gaudy, a dreamscape of faded tapestry, antique clocks and fresco-style ceiling murals of gym-rat Greek gods. The throw pillows carry the Trump shield, and the paper napkins are monogrammed with the family name. His closest neighbors, at least at this altitude, are an international set of billionaire moguls who have decided to stash their money at One57 and 432 Park, the two newest skyscrapers to remake midtown Manhattan. There is no tight-knit community in the sky, no paperboy or postman, no bowling over brews after work.

Photograph by Nadav Kander for TIME
Photograph by Nadav Kander for TIMEPresident-elect Donald Trump photographed at his penthouse on the 66th floor of Trump Tower in New York City on Nov. 28. Behind TIME’s Person of the Year Cover
And yet here Trump resides, under dripping crystal, with diamond cuff links, as the President-elect of the United States of America. The Secret Service agents milling about prove that it really happened, this election result few saw coming. Hulking and serious, they gingerly try to stay on the marble, avoiding the carpets with their uncovered shoes. On his wife Melania’s desk, next to books of Gianni Versace’s fashions and Elizabeth Taylor’s jewelry, a new volume sits front and center: The White House: Its Historic Furnishings and First Families.
For all of Trump’s public life, tastemakers and intellectuals have dismissed him as a vulgarian and carnival barker, a showman with big flash and little substance. But what those critics never understood was that their disdain gave him strength. For years, he fed off the disrespect and used it to grab more tabloid headlines, to connect to common people. Now he has upended the leadership of both major political parties and effectively shifted the political direction of the international order. He will soon command history’s most lethal military, along with economic levers that can change the lives of billions. And the people he has to thank are those he calls “the forgotten,” millions of American voters who get paid by the hour in shoes that will never touch these carpets—working folk, regular Janes and Joes, the dots in the distance.
It’s a topic Trump wants to discuss as he settles down in his dining room, with its two-story ceiling and marble table the length of a horseshoe pitch: the winning margins he achieved in West Virginia coal country, the rally crowds that swelled on Election Day, what he calls that “interesting thing,” the contradiction at the core of his appeal. “What amazes a lot of people is that I’m sitting in an apartment the likes of which nobody’s ever seen,” the next President says, smiling. “And yet I represent the workers of the world.”
The late Fidel Castro would probably spit out his cigar if he heard that one—a billionaire who branded excess claiming the slogans of the proletariat. But Trump doesn’t care. “I’m representing them, and they love me and I love them,” he continues, talking about the people of Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania, the struggling Rust Belt necklace around the Great Lakes that delivered his victory. “And here we sit, in very different circumstances.”
The Last, Greatest Deal
For nearly 17 months on the campaign trail, Trump did what no American politician had attempted in a generation, with defiant flair. Instead of painting a bright vision for a unified future, he magnified the divisions of the present, inspiring new levels of anger and fear within his country. Whatever you think of the man, this much is undeniable: he uncovered an opportunity others didn’t believe existed, the last, greatest deal for a 21st century salesman. The national press, the late-night comics, the elected leaders, the donors, the corporate chiefs and a sitting President who prematurely dropped his mic—they all believed he was just taking the country for a ride.
Now it’s difficult to count all the ways Trump remade the game: the huckster came off more real than the scripted political pros. The cable-news addict made pollsters look like chumps. The fabulist out-shouted journalists fighting to separate fact from falsehood. The demagogue won more Latino and black votes than the 2012 Republican nominee.

Trump found a way to woo white evangelicals by historic margins, even winning those who attend religious services every week. Despite boasting on video of sexually assaulting women, he still found a way to win white females by 9 points. As a champion of federal entitlements for the poor, tariffs on China and health care “for everybody,” he dominated among self-described conservatives. In a country that seemed to be bending toward its demographic future, with many straining to finally step outside the darker cycles of history, he proved that tribal instincts never die, that in times of economic strife and breakneck social change, a charismatic leader could still find the enemy within and rally the masses to his side. In the weeks after his victory, hundreds of incidents of harassment, many using his name—against women, Muslims, immigrants and racial minorities—were reported across the country.
The starting point for his success, which can be measured with just tens of thousands of votes, was the most obvious recipe in politics. He identified the central issue motivating the American electorate and then convinced a plurality of the voters in the states that mattered that he was the best person to bring change. “The greatest jobs theft in the history of the world” was his cause, “I alone can fix it” his unlikely selling point, “great again” his rallying cry.
Since the bungled Iraq War faded into the rearview mirror, there has been only one defining issue in American presidential politics, spanning party and ideology. It’s the reason Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren thunders that “the system is rigged” by the banks, and Vermont’s Bernie Sanders got so much traction denouncing the greed of “millionaires and billionaires.” It’s what Marco Rubio meant when he said, “We are losing the American Dream,” and why Jeb Bush claimed everyone has a “right to rise.”

Nadav Kander for TIME
Nadav Kander for TIMEPresident-elect Trump in the living room of his three-story penthouse on the 66th floor of Trump Tower in New York City on Nov. 28
President Barack Obama identified it early, back in 2005, as a newly elected Senator delivering a commencement speech at tiny Knox College in Galesburg, Ill. Obama’s hymn to “the forgotten” was his ticket to the White House. “You know what this new challenge is. You’ve seen it,” he said. “The fact that when you drive by the old Maytag plant around lunchtime, no one walks out anymore … It’s as if someone changed the rules in the middle of the game and no one bothered to tell these folks.”
As Obama explained it, the American promise was being put up on cinder blocks, buttressed by massive economic forces. His vow, repeated in his final 30-minute-long television ad in 2008, was change for the struggling, help for those who needed it, security for the ones who felt themselves slipping. Four years later, he would return to the same playbook to defeat Mitt Romney, casting the Republican nominee as an obtuse private-equity moneybags aiming to bankrupt Detroit. A quote pulled from a focus group—”I’m working harder and falling behind”—became the watchwords of Obama’s 2012 re-elect, hung on walls and placed atop PowerPoints. He had identified the issue, and as long as his name was on the ballot, no one could beat him.
But Obama never fully delivered the prosperity he promised. There was certainly help on the margins, slowing cost growth for health care and providing insurance to millions, for example. He started some pilot projects for manufacturing hubs, increased incomes marginally in the past couple of years and led the nation to recover from a vicious recession, with the federal government directly creating or saving millions of jobs. An unemployment rate that peaked at 10% in October 2009 has been halved to 4.6% now, at the end of his term. But the great weather systems of global change continued under his watch. Ultimately, he grew resigned to the fact that there was only so much he could do in office.
The most recently available data tells the remarkable story: between 2001 and 2012, the median incomes of households headed by people without college degrees—nearly two-thirds of all homes—fell as they aged, according to research by Robert Shapiro, an economist who advised Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign. As American productivity and gross domestic product grew in the first decade of the new century, median wages for all Americans broke away, effectively flatlining. Most Americans making less than the median income, but not so little as to qualify for poverty benefits, suffered income losses of about 5% between 2007 and 2013, according to research by Branko Milanovic, a former World Bank economist.
If you lived in the nation’s great cities or held a college degree, you probably didn’t feel the full fury of these forces. Average income declines for top earners were closer to 1% during the postrecession years. Global change is tricky that way. It enriches those in the developed world who can handle bits and bytes, create something new or sell their work at a distance. And it elevates the fortunes of the global poor, largely in Asia, pushing about a billion people from poverty into the beginnings of a new China-led middle class.
But for the working men and women of developed countries, many of whom had made good livings in the 20th century, the price of others’ success could be seen all around, in peeling house paint and closed storefronts, in towns that went belly-up when one of the two big employers closed shop. The pressures pushed across the Atlantic Ocean. The size of the middle classes, as measured by those who earn 25% above or below the median income, dropped in the U.S. from the 1980s to 2013. It also dropped in Spain and Germany, the Netherlands and the U.K. It is no accident that all those countries now find themselves in the midst of political upheaval as well.
The reasons for the shifts are more complex than the simple offshoring of manufacturing plants to Mexico or China. Global trade and new technology also pressure wages on jobs beyond the assembly line. When combined with rising health-insurance costs and incessant shareholder demands, companies found themselves unable or unwilling to give raises. Automation also accelerated as factories turned to robots, checkout lines retooled with self-operated terminals, and engineers developed self-driving trucks and taxis. Political gridlock in Washington, and the mild austerity it created, weighed everything down.
‘I hoped for change and never saw it’
But properly diagnosing the problem doesn’t help much if you live in a place that has taken it on the chin. In Shiawassee County, Michigan, which sits like a pit stop between Flint and Lansing, Obama won comfortably in 2008 and by a narrow margin in 2012. Then Trump tromped to victory this year with a 20-point margin. Rick Mengel, a 69-year-old retired pipe fitter, was one of the union members who voted for the young Illinois Senator in 2008, after seeing him promise to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement, which Obama once called “devastating” and a “big mistake.”
“I hoped for change and never saw it,” Mengel says of the Obama years. “I watched jobs go away, and any jobs that came in were at McDonald’s. I’m not knocking McDonald’s, but it’s a starter job. It doesn’t make the car or house payments.” When a friend bought him a MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN hat this year, Mengel took to wearing it everywhere he went. He never believed the polls that said Hillary Clinton would carry Michigan, because he can’t remember ever sitting down with a group of five or six people and finding more than one for her. “Hillary came along and she just never said what she was going to do,” Mengel explains. “She just talked bad about Trump.”
First he needed to define the bad guys. then he needed to knock them over.
Such voices were easy to find in central Michigan, northeast Pennsylvania and western Wisconsin in the days after the election. Here were historically Democratic counties that Obama had won twice, only to see Trump then win comfortably. They are mostly white parts of the country, with struggling Main Streets and low college-graduation rates, where the local beauty salons do better business than the car dealers. They are places where people start their life stories by recounting the good-paying jobs their grandparents held, or the long-gone second homes up on the lake where they used to play as kids. In the 1970s, the bumper stickers on trucks in Prairie du Chien, Wis., would read LIVE BETTER. WORK UNION. Now the sign in the local Walmart says, SAVE MONEY. LIVE BETTER.
Joseph Dougherty, a former Democratic mayor of Nanticoke, Pa. who manages an automotive paint store, switched his voter registration this year for Trump. He was one of many in Luzerne County, a gorgeous river valley of rolling hills and former coal mines, who had lost patience. Trump cleared 78,000 votes in these hills, 20,000 more than Romney. “The Democratic Party forgot about its base. It’s all less for us and more for someone else,” Dougherty said, explaining how he could betray the party he was born into. “People are tired of surviving. People want to go on vacation, improve their home, get a better car, invest in their children’s future.”
Economists looking at the voting patterns since Election Day have been able to draw clear correlations between the local effects of international trade and voter angst. In counties where Chinese imports grew between 2002 and 2014, the vote for Trump increased over the vote George W. Bush won in 2000. For every percentage-point increase in imports, the economists found an average 2-point increase for the Republican nominee.
In some places, the shift was even steeper. In Branch County, Michigan, near the Indiana border, about halfway between Detroit and Chicago, a 3% increase in Chinese imports coincided with an 11% bump for Trump over Bush. The message of renewed protectionism, new tariffs and scrapped trade agreements broke through. “His approach was much more visceral,” says David Autor, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology economist, who co-authored the study. “He seemed to say, ‘We don’t have to adapt to globalization. We can reverse it.'”
It’s hard to find any trained economist who believes that’s possible, at least in the terms Trump uses. The supply chains are too broadly dispersed, the pricing efficiencies too embedded in our lives, the robots too cost-effective. Then there are the dangers of massive disruption, the unquantifiable costs of trade wars, or the actual wars that could follow.
But Trump’s improvement on Obama’s sales pitch was never about the details. He communicated on a deeper level, something he has done all his life. His was not a campaign about the effects of tariffs on the price of batteries or basketball shoes. He spoke only of winning and losing, us and them, the strong and the weak. Trump is a student of the tabloids, a master of television. He had moonlighted as a professional wrestler. He knew how to win the crowd. First he needed to define the bad guys. Then he needed to knock them over.
The Presidency as Improv
On Dec. 1, just weeks after his victory, Trump traveled to Indiana to announce that United Technologies, the 45th largest company in the country, had agreed to his demands and would retain 800 Carrier manufacturing jobs in Indianapolis. This mostly fulfilled a campaign promise he had made after the factory became national news when video shot inside showed the despair of workers discovering their work was headed to Mexico. “Companies are not going to leave the United States anymore without consequences,” he declared at the plant.
Three days earlier, Trump met with TIME in his towering dining room. The Carrier deal was basically done, thanks to a mixture of $7 million in state tax breaks, presidential threats and promises of tax and regulatory reform. But it was still a secret. His running mate, former Indiana governor Mike Pence, declined to discuss the deal when a reporter ran into him in Trump’s high-rise kitchen. But Trump could not stop himself. “I’m going to give you this off the record,” he said. “You can use it if they announce.”
For both conservative and liberal ideologues, including Sarah Palin and Bernie Sanders, the deal Trump struck with Carrier was an abomination, an example of government using taxpayer money to pick winners and losers. But as Trump told the story in his tower, ideology had nothing to do with it. This was just another tale of a little guy getting his voice heard.
“So the other night, I’m watching the news,” Trump began. NBC’s Lester Holt had introduced a segment on the Carrier plant featuring a union representative and a plant worker talking in a bar. The man looked at the camera and spoke to Trump, saying, “We want you to do what you said you were going to do.” Trump claimed this shocked him: “I said, I never said they weren’t going to move, to myself.”
But of course he had, as the news segment demonstrated. So Trump says he had no choice. He had to listen to his people. “He energized me, that man,” the President-elect explained. “And I called up the head of United Technologies.”
Shortly after he spoke those words, Reince Priebus, the next White House chief of staff, walked into the room. With the tape recorders rolling, Trump began to issue new instructions. “Hey, Reince, I want to get a list of companies that have announced they’re leaving,” he called out. “I can call them myself. Five minutes apiece. They won’t be leaving. O.K.?”
He was talking as if he had just realized—at that moment, in the middle of an interview—that he had the power to do what he promised to do on the campaign trail. But it was just a show. At that point, Trump had already had a similar talk with Bill Ford of Ford Motor Co., and he boasted of putting out three other calls out to corporations with outsourcing plans.
This is the presidency as improv, as performance art, with good guys, bad guys and suspense. It’s a new thing for the United States of America. The reporters in the room, the voters who will read this article, the nation, the world—we are the audience. A quick study who grew up in Kenosha, Wis., Priebus is far too Midwestern to be mistaken for a showman. But he got what Trump was trying to do, and smiled. “It worked for you last time,” he told the boss.
Missing the Message
History will record that Clinton foresaw the economic forces that allowed Trump to win. What she and her team never fully understood was the depth of the populism Trump was peddling, the idea that the elites were arrayed against regular people, and that he, the great man, the strong man, the offensive man, the disruptive man, the entertaining man, could remake the physics of an election.
“You cannot underestimate the role of the backlash against political correctness—the us vs. the elite,” explains Kellyanne Conway, who worked as Trump’s final campaign manager. His previous campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, put it somewhat more delicately: “We always felt comfortable that when people were criticizing him for being so outspoken, the American voters were hearing him too.”


1 of 9




In June 2015, Clinton’s pollster Joel Benenson laid out the state of the country in a private memo to senior staff that was later released to the public by WikiLeaks. The picture of voters was much the same as the one he had described to Obama in 2008 and 2012. “When they look to the future, they see growing obstacles, but nobody having their back,” Benenson wrote. “They can’t keep up; they work hard but can’t move ahead.” The top priority he listed for voters was “protecting American jobs here at home.”
That message anchored the launch of Clinton’s campaign, and it was woven through her three debate performances. But in the closing weeks, she shifted to something else. No presidential candidate in American history had done or said so many outlandish and offensive things as Trump. He cheered when protesters got hit at his rallies, used sexist insults for members of the press, argued that an American judge should be disqualified from a case because of his Mexican heritage. He would tell an allegory about Muslim refugees entering the U.S. that cast those families fleeing violence as venomous snakes, waiting to sink their fangs into “tenderhearted” women. And he would match those stories with bloody tales of undocumented immigrants from Mexico who murdered Americans in cold blood. “His disregard for the values that make our country great is profoundly dangerous,” Clinton argued.
His rhetoric had in fact opened up a new public square, where racists and misogynists could boast of their views and claim themselves validated. And to further enrage many Americans, Trump regularly peddled falsehoods, without offering any evidence, and then refused to back down from his claims. He promised to sue the dozen women who came forward to say they had been sexually mistreated by him over the years. He said he might not accept the outcome of the election if it did not go his way. He described a crime wave gripping the country based on a selective reading of statistics.
For a Clinton campaign aiming to re-create Obama’s winning coalitions, all of this proved too large a target to pass up. Clinton had proved to be a subpar campaigner, so with the FBI restarting and reclosing a criminal investigation into her email habits, her closing message focused on a moral argument about Trump’s character. “Our core values are being tested in this election,” she said in Philadelphia, the night before the election. “We know enough about my opponent. We know who he is. The real question for us is what kind of country we want to be.”
The strategy worked, in a way. Clinton got about 2.5 million more votes than Trump, and on Election Day, more than 6 in 10 voters told exit pollsters that Trump lacked the temperament for the job of President. But the strategy also placed Clinton too far away from the central issue in the nation: the steady decline of the American standard of living. She lost the places that mattered most. “There’s a difference for voters between what offends you and what affects you,” Conway helpfully explained after it was over.
Stanley Greenberg, the opinion-research guru for Bill Clinton in 1992, put out a poll around Election Day and found clear evidence that Clinton’s decision to divert her message from the economy in the final weeks cost her the decisive vote in the Rust Belt. “The data does not support the idea that the white working class was inevitably lost,” Greenberg wrote, “until the Clinton campaign stopped talking about economic change and asked people to vote for unity, temperament and experience, and to continue on President Obama’s progress.” Interestingly, Greenberg said turnout among young, minority and unmarried female voters also decreased when the economic message Obama had used fell away.
Anecdote, Not Analysis
The irony of this conclusion is profound. By seeking to condemn the dark side of politics, Clinton’s campaign may have accidently validated it. By believing in the myth that Obama’s election represented a permanent shift for the nation, they proved it was ephemeral. In the end, Trump reveled in these denunciations, which helped him market to his core supporters his determination to smash the existing elite. After the election, Trump’s campaign CEO Stephen Bannon—the former head of a website known for stirring racial animus and provoking liberal outrage—explained it simply. “Darkness is good,” he told the Hollywood Reporter.

Nadav Kander for TIME
Nadav Kander for TIMEThe Rabble-Rouser: The former head of Breitbart, Stephen Bannon has pushed for a darker, more divisive populism, publishing articles that stirred racial animus. He will be a senior adviser at the White House.
This is the method of a demagogue. The more the elites denounced his transgressions, the more his growing movement felt validated. Shortly after the campaign, Trump tweeted that 3 million votes had been cast illegally on Nov. 8, a false claim for which he has offered no hard evidence. But when asked about it in his penthouse, he seems eager to talk about the controversy he stirred. “I’ve seen many, many complaints,” he says. “Tremendous numbers of complaints.”
In the dining room, a TIME reporter reads to Trump one of Obama’s oft-stated quotes about trying to appeal to the country’s better angels and to fight its tribal instincts. Trump promptly stops the interview in its tracks. The human brain is wired for anecdote, not analysis, and Trump’s whole career is a testament to this insight. Even when his business failures mounted, he could always boast about the ratings of his hit reality show, The Apprentice, or that time he finished construction on the Wollman ice rink outside his window. “So let me go upstairs for one second and get you one newspaper article,” he says. “Do you mind if I take a one-second break?” And then he disappears into his living quarters above.
He returns a few minutes later with that morning’s copy of Newsday, the Long Island tabloid. The front-page headline reads, “EXTREMELY VIOLENT” GANG FACTION, with an article about a surge of local crime by foreign-born assailants. His point, it seems, is that the world is zero-sum, full of the irredeemable killers that Obama’s idealism fails to see. The details are more compelling than any big picture. “They come from Central America. They’re tougher than any people you’ve ever met,” Trump says. “They’re killing and raping everybody out there. They’re illegal. And they are finished.”
A reporter mentions that what Trump is saying echoes the rhetoric of Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, who has overseen the extrajudicial killing of thousands of alleged drug dealers and users in recent months. The President-elect offers no objection to the comparison. “Well, hey, look, this is bad stuff,” he says. “They slice them up, they carve their initials in the girl’s forehead, O.K. What are we supposed to do? Be nice about it?”
Days later, Trump will have a phone call with the Philippine President, who called President Obama the “son of a whore” a few months ago. A readout from the Philippine government subsequently announces that during the call, Trump praised Duterte’s deadly drug crackdown as “the right way.”
Populism Takes Center Stage
A year from now, when Trump travels to the U.N. to address the world’s leaders, he is likely to find far more sympathy for this hard-edged populism than any thought possible in 2008. Trump is all but rooting for it. “People are proud of their countries, and I think you will see nationalism,” he says, before describing the growing backlash against Muslim migration in France, Belgium and Germany. “A lot of people reject some of the ideas that are being forced on them. And that’s certainly one of the reasons you had this vote, having to do not with the European Union but the same thing.”
In this view, Trump will find common cause with Vladimir Putin, the authoritarian President of Russia who, like Trump, seeks to challenge diplomatic and democratic norms. For reasons that remain unclear, Trump still refuses to acknowledge the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that Putin’s agencies were responsible for stealing the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign emails released on WikiLeaks. “I don’t believe it. I don’t believe they interfered,” Trump says. Asked if he thought the conclusion of America’s spies was politically driven, Trump says, “I think so.” Since the election, Trump has chosen not to consistently make himself available for intelligence briefings, say aides.
He has also so far refused to acknowledge established diplomatic boundaries. When the Pakistani government gave a long, apparently verbatim readout of its President’s call with Trump, India’s leaders reacted with strained nerves. Then Trump accepted a phone call from Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen, intentionally discarding a policy enforced since Jimmy Carter, which prompted an official complaint from China. In response, he sent out a tweet suggesting that such formalities, a bow to Chinese sensibilities, were ridiculous. “Interesting how the U.S. sells Taiwan billions of dollars of military equipment but I should not accept a congratulatory call,” it read.
As he proved in the campaign, there are sometimes few negative consequences in politics for offending or painting a false picture of reality. History suggests the same is less true in international relations, where the stakes are not just votes at the ballot box but also the movement of armies and the lives of citizens. Among the tight circle that has formed around Trump, one can sense some unease as they try to navigate a mercurial boss to a successful first term. There is talk of strategies for steering him when he is wrong, for appealing to his own intention to succeed. And Trump himself, true to his reality-show persona, has a history of allowing his staff to fight among themselves for his attention. “If I had to describe his deliberating style, I would say that it’s very similar to Socratic method, just like in law school,” explains Priebus. “He asks a lot of questions, he wants answers to those questions to be thorough and quick, and he relies on the people giving him the answers to be accurate.”
Just a day earlier, Conway had gone on television to suggest that picking Romney, an old Trump foe, for Secretary of State was a terrible idea. Some Trump aides told reporters that this amounted to a betrayal of the boss, who had not yet made up his mind. Trump seemed to enjoy the spectacle. “I might not like it, but I thought it was fine,” he says at the dining-room table. “Otherwise I would have called her up.”

Nadav Kander for TIME
Nadav Kander for TIMEThe Reconciler: After serving as Republican chair during the chaotic campaign, Reince Priebus will become Trump’s first White House chief of staff, acting as a bridge to the Washington establishment. The Trump Whisperer: A former resident of one of Trump’s buildings, pollster Kellyanne Conway became his campaign manager in August. She is known for her blunt advice, sometimes through TV appearances.
At the same time, Trump has tried to curtail some of his own bravado since the campaign. The day after the election, Priebus says, Trump told his aides in his apartment, “Guys, I’m for everybody in this country.” Last year, Trump boasted about the great instincts that led him to support forced deportation for all undocumented immigrants and a ban on Muslims from entering the country. He has since backed off both positions. “I mean, I’ve had some bad moments in the campaign,” he says. But then he notes that his poll numbers seemed to rise after several of them, including his insults of Arizona Senator John McCain’s war service.
Trump claims that his unpredictability will be his strength in office. It certainly has left the political world guessing. He has so far refused to describe how he will separate himself from the conflict of owning a company and employing his children who do regular business with foreigners. On the one hand, he supports a broad policy platform shared by conservatives in Congress: a reduction in regulations, lower taxes, a pull back from the fight against global warming, and a cabinet filled with free-market ideologues. On the other hand, he has signaled that he is willing to break from Republican doctrine. His designated Treasury Secretary, the former Goldman Sachs banker Steve Mnuchin, has said Trump would back off his campaign suggestion that he would give large net tax windfalls to the wealthiest. “Any reductions we have in upper-income taxes will be offset by less deductions,” Mnuchin said.
While Trump offered public words of support for the Iraq War at the time, he sees George W. Bush’s great adventure as a disaster now. He rejects wholesale the social conservative campaign to keep transgender people out of the bathrooms they choose, but promises to reward conservative ideologues with a Supreme Court Justice of their liking. And he has little patience for the organizing principle of the Tea Party: the idea that the federal government must live within its means and lower its debts. Instead, he seems to favor expensive new infrastructure spending and tax cuts as economic stimulus, much like Obama did in 2009. “Well, sometimes you have to prime the pump,” he says. “So sometimes in order to get jobs going and the country going, because, look, we’re at 1% growth.” The next day, the third-quarter gross-domestic-product estimates would be released, showing an increase of 3.2%, up from 1.4% earlier in the year.
He also suggests that some stock analysts may have misread his intentions. The value of biotechnology stocks, for example, which enjoy large profit margins under current law, rose 9% in the day after Trump’s election, a rally of relief that the price controls Clinton had proposed would not happen. But Trump says his goal has not wavered. “I’m going to bring down drug prices,” he says. “I don’t like what has happened with drug prices.”
As for the people who were brought to the U.S. illegally as youths and now have work visas under Obama, Trump did not back off his pledge to end Obama’s executive orders. But he made clear he would like to find some future accommodation for them. “We’re going to work something out that’s going to make people happy and proud,” he says, showing a sympathy for young migrants that was often absent during the campaign. “They got brought here at a very young age, they’ve worked here, they’ve gone to school here. Some were good students. Some have wonderful jobs. And they’re in never-never land because they don’t know what’s going to happen.”

Nadav Kander for TIME
Nadav Kander for TIMEThe True Believer: A devout evangelical Christian and a former leader in the U.S. House, Vice President–elect Mike Pence will help Trump navigate the agendas of conservative lawmakers and activists.
Trump’s America, for Better and Worse
The truth is no one really knows what is going to happen, up to and including the occupants of Trump Tower. “It’s a very exciting time. It’s really been an amazing time,” Trump says, as the country still tries to come to terms with what he accomplished. “Hopefully we can take some of the drama out.”
That’s not likely to happen anytime soon. Following a President who prided himself on sifting drama through the sieve of careful consideration, Trump’s methods, for better and worse, tend to be closer to the opposite. And this is now Trump’s America to run, a victory made possible either because of historical inevitability or individual brilliance, or some combination of the two.
It’s an America with rising stock markets despite the tremors of a trade war. A country where a few jobs saved makes up, in the moment, for the thousands still departing. This is a land where a man will stand up in a plane headed to Allentown, Pa., to demand allegiance to the new leader—”We got some Hillary bitches on here? Come on man, Trump! He’s your President, every goddamn one of you!”—and then get banned by the airline from ever traveling again. It’s where a hijab-wearing college student in New York reports being attacked and jeered at in the next President’s name, where American-born children ask their citizen parents if Trump will deport them, where white supremacists throw out Nazi salutes in Washington meeting halls for their President-elect.
It’s a country where many who felt powerless have a new champion, where much frustration has given way to excitement and where politics has become the greatest show on earth. Here men in combat helmets and military assault rifles now patrol the streets outside a golden residential tower in midtown Manhattan. And almost every day at about the same time they let pass a street performer who wears no pants, tight white underwear and cowboy boots, so he can sing a song in the lobby for the television cameras with Trump’s name written in red and blue on his butt. It’s an America of renewed hope and paralyzing fear, a country few expected less than a year ago. Because of Donald John Trump, whatever happens next, it will never be like it was before.
With reporting by Zeke J. Miller/New York; Elizabeth Dias/Saginaw, Mich.; Haley Sweetland Edwards/Nanticoke, Pa.; and Karl Vick/Lancaster, Wis.



terça-feira, 6 de dezembro de 2016

JUÍZES E PROMOTORES PROTESTAM NO DF CONTRA MUDANÇAS EM PACOTE ANTICORRUPÇÃO

#A STRONG NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ANTI-CORRUPTION COALITION OF

#A STRONG NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ANTI-CORRUPTION COALITION OF
I) 487 THOUSANDS OF BRAZILIAN DEMONSTRATORS TOOK THE STREETS  SUPPORTING JUDICARY &

II) THE PARALLEL BRAZILIAN JUDGES MOVEMENT A FEW DAYS BEFORE &

III)RECENT INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED ACHIEVEENTS OF BRAZIL INTERNATIONALLY-RECOGNIZED ACHIEVEMENTS OF BRAZIL’S CARWASH TASK FORCE WHICH WINS TRANSPARENCY INTERANTIONAL ANTI- CORRUPTION AWARD


==//==












December 5, 2016
Currently: 48° — Complete forecast









































Thousands protest corruption, support judiciary in Brazil



Silvia Izquierdo / AP
A woman dressed in the likeness of a police officer Sunday, Dec. 4, 2016, shouts slogans during a protest against corruption on Copacabana beach, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Thousands of protesters crowded Rio de Janeiro’s beachfront to express disgust with public corruption and to support the judges and prosecutors pursuing those crimes.


By Ernesto Moreno Quintana and Sarah DiLorenzo, Associated Press
Sunday, Dec. 4, 2016 | 6:03 p.m.
Rio de Janeiro — 
Tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets in cities across Brazil on Sunday to express disgust with public corruption and outrage at what they say are lawmakers' attempts to muzzle the judges and prosecutors pursuing those crimes.
Protesters, many dressed in the green and yellow of Brazil's flag, massed along a major artery in Sao Paulo and along Copacabana beach in Rio de Janeiro. Other protests were held in cities around the country. Many demonstrators wore T-shirts or held banners in support of Sergio Moro, the judge who has led a hard-charging investigation into a kickback scheme involving the national oil company, several construction conglomerates and politicians.
The investigation, known as Operation Car Wash, has shocked Brazilians both for the scale of corruption it has revealed and for the commitment of the judiciary to see it through in a country where many feel the rich and powerful act with impunity.
But Sunday's demonstrations also united a motley group of protesters whose only common cause appeared to be disgust with elected officials. They represented a cross-section of an increasingly fractured Brazil. In addition to those supporting the corruption investigation, some held signs calling for the removal from office of the president and leaders in Congress. Some called for the jailing of a former president now facing corruption charges. Still others were advocating a return to military rule.
"I want people who have character running the country," said Regina Medeiros, a 67-year-old retiree, who held a banner that read: "Let's finish with political parties before they finish Brazil." ''People are losing faith in other human beings," she added.
Around 15,000 people protested in Sao Paulo, according to an estimate from military police; they said they did not have a number for demonstrations in Rio de Janeiro. At least another 40,000 people came out in scores of other cities around Brazil, including the capital of Brasilia, according to estimates from military police published by the G1 news portal.
Many hoped that after former President Dilma Rousseff was impeached and removed from office earlier this year, Brazilian politics would settle, and reforms proposed by the new president might pull the economy out of deep recession. But instead, those reforms have met with significant protests, President Michel Temer has seen his popularity plummet, and the economic crisis appears to be worsening.
Through it all, accusations of corruption against former or current leaders seem to come weekly. Scandal has touched several members of Temer's Cabinet, and six have resigned. Meanwhile, anger at the scale of corruption and frustration with the impotence of the government to address it is rising.
The one bright spot appeared to be the tenacity of the judiciary and its determination to see through Operation Car Wash.
But last week, the prosecutors leading that investigation threatened to quit, accusing Congress of passing legislation that would leave them vulnerable to retribution from those they have prosecuted. The measure, approved in a marathon overnight session in the lower house of Congress as part of a package of anti-corruption laws, would allow defendants to accuse prosecutors and judges of abusing their authority.
"In the middle of the night, the house of deputies disfigured this (anti-corruption) project. Instead of punishing the corrupt, they want to punish investigating prosecutors and judges," said Agnes Musseliner, a prosecutor who attended the protest in Rio. "We are here to protest against this absurdity, to guarantee the independence of the public prosecutor's office and Brazilian judicial authority."
The package was proposed by the public prosecutor earlier this year and included measures that would toughen penalties for corruption and accelerate the handling of corruption cases in courts. But in its overnight session, held while Brazil was mourning the deaths in a plane crash of members of a beloved soccer team, the lower house of Congress dropped some of the toughest measures, like allowing prosecutors to reach more plea bargains, in addition to adding the one that allows prosecutors and judges to be charged with abuse of power.
Paola Augusta Mariano Margues, a 31-year-old prosecutor in Sao Paulo, said the measure could have a chilling effect on investigations because it could leave prosecutors vulnerable when investigations don't lead to charges.
Moro has called it an effort to intimidate the judiciary and halt Operation Car Wash before it implicates any more lawmakers. He pleaded with the Senate not to pass it, and judges and prosecutors are asking the president not to sign if it does.
"Sergio Moro, we are with you," read a giant banner at the Sao Paulo protest, where demonstrators frequently chanted his name.
01/12/2016 15h52 Updated 12/01/2016 8h23
Brazilian Judges and prosecutors protest against
changes in anti-corruption Law
01/12/2016 15h52 Updated 12/01/2016 8h23
Brazilian Judges and prosecutors protest against
changes in anti-corruption Law

Board withdrew six proposals from the MPF and defaced the project. It included possible punishment of magistrates for abuse of authority.

Judges and prosecutors protest against changes in anti-corruption package Judges and prosecutors protest against changes in anti-corruption Law.


Judges and prosecutors protested in front of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) early Thursday afternoon against the approval of amendments that amend anti-corruption measures. The package with the amendments was approved by the Chamber of Deputies at dawn on Wednesday (30). Among the changes is the withdrawal of the criminalization of the crime of illicit enrichment and the inclusion of the crime of responsibility to magistrates and members of the Public Prosecutor's Office who commit some type of abuse of authority. Protests were also held in cities of Paraíba, Paraná, Pernambuco, Rio Grande do Sul and São Paulo.

Senator Randolfe Rodrigues (Rede-AP) made a statement on the back staircase of the STF building, where members of the judiciary were concentrated. "The Congress is trying to impose a gag on the prosecution and the country's judges," he said. "It was approved in the dead of night to build an accessory instrument of impunity."


Judges and prosecutors protest in Mexico City against changes in anti-corruption Law

"Those who suffer in prisons and do not have the money to pay big lawyers have always needed projects against abuses of power, and Congress has never given them," he added. According to him, a substitute will be presented to the project against abuse of power. "Debating this at the time of the biggest fight against corruption is trying to stop the bleeding."

The president of the Associative Front of the Magistracy and the Public Prosecution, Norma Cavalcanti, delivered a letter to the president of the Supreme Court, Minister Carmen Lúcia (see the full document). The text declares support for the Federal institutions and asks the STF to defend the autonomy and independence of the MP and judges.


"We have come to tell the minister that we are fighting corruption and impunity. The independence of the Public Prosecutor's Office and the judiciary is a constitutional guarantee of citizenship and must be considered the patrimony of the nation, because it belongs to the people," he said. Upon receiving the letter, Carmen Lúcia said she would read "carefully" and that the Supreme Court is "fighting for the Constitution to be guaranteed."


The president of the National Association of Labor Attorneys, Ângelo Fabiano Farias da Costa, criticized Senate President Renan Calheiros's attempt to rush the vote of the measures by the House plenary this afternoon. "It is a real slap in the face of Brazilian society. They have made the ten measures against corruption a pro-corruption project," he said.
Magistrates exhibit Brazilian flag and poster during protest against changes in corruption package (Photo: Luiza Garonce / G1) Magistrates exhibit Brazilian flag and poster during protest against changes in corruption package (Photo: Luiza Garonce / G1)


Magistrates exhibit Brazil's flag and poster during protest against changes in corruption package (Photo: Luiza Garonce / G1)
After the pronouncement of senators and prosecutors, the magistrates sang the national anthem to the chapel. The magistrates left the back of the STF hand in hand, making a chain around the building, and returned to the front. Meanwhile, indigenous people danced in circles in front of the building. They tied a strip, facing the court, with the words "we want to live in peace, no destruction in the Amazon."

The president of the National Association of Attorneys General, José Robalinho Cavalcanti, said that the Chamber session that approved amendments to the anti-corruption bill was one of the "most aggressive and superficial" sessions in 30 years. "If the deputies wanted to give a message to the people, it is opposite to what the people wanted to hear."

According to the elected vice-president of the Association of Magistrates of Brazil (AMB), Renata Gil, the text needs to be revised. "Abuse of authority is not new, people are punished, but norms in this text have been included that are not republican."

Asked what the AMB's performance if the bill is approved by the Senate without reservations, Renata said she "trusts in the Federal Senate," but will take the legal measures to revert the decision. On the performance of Renan Calheiros, who tried to rush the vote on the package on Wednesday (30), the magistrate said she was surprised.

"We have been at the beginning of the week trying to show that there are extremely expensive issues for society. We were very sad, too, because we were open to dialogue and we were not reciprocated," he said. "The texts were presented at the last minute without the class being aware of the content, and the votes were expressed. The approved text arrived late yesterday afternoon in the Senate, and the president tried for immediate approval in the middle of a scenario of Punishment of corrupt and corrupt agents. We magistrates denote a serious intention of intimidation. "

==//==


MENU
Parte superior do formulário
Parte inferior do formulário
MENU
Parte superior do formulário

Parte inferior do formulário
Juízes e promotores protestam contra mudanças em pacote anticorrupção
Câmara retirou seis propostas do MPF e desfigurou projeto. Foi incluída possível punição a magistrados por abuso de autoridade.




Por G1 DF
01/12/2016 15h52 Atualizado 01/12/2016 20h23
Juízes e promotores protestaram em frente ao Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) no início da tarde desta quinta-feira (1º) contra a aprovação das emendas que alteram as medidas de combate corrupção. O pacote com as alterações foi aprovado pela Câmara dos Deputados na madrugada desta quarta (30). Entre as mudanças, está a retirada da tipificação do crime de enriquecimento ilícito e a inclusão do crime de responsabilidade a magistrados e membros do Ministério Público que cometerem algum tipo de abuso de autoridade. Protestos também foram realizados em cidades de Paraíba, Paraná, Pernambuco, Rio Grande do Sul e São Paulo.
O senador Randolfe Rodrigues (Rede-AP) fez um pronunciamento na escadaria dos fundos do prédio do STF, onde estavam concentrados membros do judiciário. “O Congresso está tentando impor uma mordaça no Ministério Público e nos juízes do país", afirmou. "Foi aprovada na calada da noite a construção de um instrumento acessório da impunidade.”
Juízes e promotores protestam no DF contra mudanças em pacote anticorrupção
"Abuso de autoridade existe nesse país há muito tempo contra pobres. Aqueles que padecem nos presídios e não têm dinheiro para pagar grandes advogados sempre precisaram de projetos contra abusos de poder, e o Congresso nunca lhes deu", completou o senador. Segundo ele, será apresentado um substitutivo ao projeto contra abuso de poder. "Debater isso no momento em que se processa o maior combate à corrupção é tentar estancar a sangria.”
A presidente da Frente Associativa da Magistratura e do Ministério Público, Norma Cavalcanti, entregou uma carta à presidente do STF, ministra Carmen Lúcia (veja a íntegra do documento). O texto declara apoio às instituições Federais e pede ao STF que defenda a autonomia e a independência do MP e juízes.
"Viemos dizer à ministra que combatemos a corrupção e a impunidade. A independência do Ministério Público e do Judiciário é uma garantia constitucional da cidadania e deve ser considerada patrimônio da nação, porque pertence ao povo", disse. Ao receber a carta, Carmen Lúcia disse que leria "com todo o cuidado" e que o Supremo está "lutando para que a Constituição seja garantida".
O presidente da Associação Nacional dos Procuradores do Trabalho, Ângelo Fabiano Farias da Costa, criticou a tentativa do presidente do Senado, Renan Calheiros, de apressar a votação das medidas pelo plenário da casa na tarde desta quarta. "É um verdadeiro tapa na cara da sociedade brasileira. Tornaram as dez medidas contra a corrupção um projeto pró-corrupção", disse.
Magistrados exibem bandeira do Brasil e cartaz durante protesto contra mudanças no pacote corrupção (Foto: Luiza Garonce/G1)
Após o pronunciamento de senadores e procuradores, os magistrados cantaram o hino nacional à capela. Os magistrados deixaram a parte de trás do STF de mãos dadas, fazendo uma corrente em volta do prédio, e voltaram para a fachada. Enquanto isso, indígenas dançavam em círculos em frente ao prédio. Eles amarraram uma faixa, virada para o tribunal, com os dizeres "queremos viver em paz. Nada de destruição na Amazônia".
O presidente da Associação Nacional dos Procuradores da República, José Robalinho Cavalcanti, disse que a sessão da Câmara que aprovou as emendas ao projeto anticorrupção foi uma das sessões "mais agressivas e mais superficiais" em 30 anos. "Se os deputados queriam passar um recado ao povo, é oposto ao que o povo queria ouvir."
De acordo com a vice-presidente eleita da Associação dos Magistrados do Brasil (AMB), Renata Gil, o texto precisa ser revisto. "Abuso de autoridade não é novidade, as pessoas são punidas, mas tem sido incluídas normas neste texto que não são republicanas."
Questionada sobre o que a atuação da AMB caso o projeto seja aprovado pelo Senado sem ressalvas, Renata afirmou que "confia no Senado Federal", mas tomará as medidas jurídicas cabíveis para reverter a decisão. Sobre a atuação de Renan Calheiros, que tentou apressar a votação do pacote nesta quarta (30), a magistrada disse ter sido surpreendida.
"Estamos desde o início da semana tentando mostrar que existem temas extremamente caros à sociedade. Ficamos muito tristes, também, porque nos mostramos abertos ao diálogo e não fomos correspondidos", disse. "Os textos foram apresentados de última hora sem que a classe tivesse o conhecimento do conteúdo, e as votações foram expressas. O texto aprovado chegou no final da tarde de ontem no Senado, e o presidente tentou a aprovação imediata em meio a um cenário de punição de agentes corruptos e corruptores. Nós, magistrados, denotamos uma grave intenção de intimidação."
O ato ocorreu horas depois de o juiz Sérgio Moro, responsável pela Operação Lava Jato na primeira instância, questionar em audiência no Senado o projeto do abuso de autoridade. Ele havia dito que "talvez" não seja o "melhor momento" para aprovação do texto, tendo em vista as diversas operações policiais em curso. O ministro do STF Gilmar Mendes subiu à tribuna em seguida e ironizou a fala, perguntando se seria preciso aguardar um "ano sabático das operações" para aprovar o projeto.
Outros estados
Em Curitiba, onde são julgados os processos da Lava Jato em primeira instância, juízes também protestaram contra as mudanças no projeto anticorrupção. A manifestação reuniu mais de 50 pessoas e ocorreu em frente ao prédio da Justiça Federal.
O juiz federal Nicolau Konkel Junior classificou o projeto como "pró-corrupção". O procurador do Ministério Público Federal (MPF) e coordenador da força-tarefa da Lava Jato, Deltan Dallagnol, também participou do ato, mas não se pronunciou.
Em São Paulo, promotores e juízes protestaram em frente à entrada do Fórum da Barra Funda, na Zona Oeste, contra as novas regras para o abuso de autoridade – uma das emendas da lei anti-corrupção. A mudança foi sugerida pela bancada do PDT e lista situações em que juízes e promotores poderão ser processados.
Em Recife, promotores de Justiça e servidores do Ministério Público protestaram em frente à sede da Procuradoria Geral de Justiça, no bairro de Santo Antônio. A mobilização teve início por volta das 14h30 e durou cerca de 20 minutos. O procurador-geral de Justiça do estado, Carlos Guerra, leu uma nota de repúdio. Segundo a assessoria do MPPE, o ato contou com a participação de 150 pessoas. Já a Polícia Militar de Pernambuco informou que não divulga estimativa de participantes de protestos.
Juízes e promotores protestam contra projeto do abuso de autoridade em São Paulo (Foto: Will Soares/G1)
No Rio Grande do Sul, juízes e servidores do MP se reuniram em frente ao Tribunal de Justiça. O ato foi batizado como "Um Minuto de Silêncio pela Democracia". A Associação de Juízes Federais do estado também emitiu nota de repúdio ao projeto, no que diz respeito à criminalização da atuação de magistrados e integrantes do MP.
Em João Pessoa, magistrados e promotores fizeram um protesto em frente ao Fórum Cível. De acordo com a Associação Paraibana do Ministério Público (APMP), a manifestação também aconteceu nos municípios de Patos, Sousa, Guarabira e Campina Grande.
"Nós queremos chamar a população para esta luta e mostrar que o Ministério Público e o Judiciário não estão preocupados consigo mesmo, mas com a sociedade, para vedarmos juntos este retrocesso do estado Brasileiro e da nossa democracia", disse o promotor de Justiça e diretor jurídico da associação, Leonardo Quintans.
Em Bauru e Marília, juízes, procuradores e promotores leram cartas de repúdio de entidades locais. Para os magistrados, a criminalização das ações do Judiciário pode prejudicar trabalhos futuros. Uma carta de oposição às mudanças também foi lida por juristas da região de Sorocaba, na tarde desta quinta.
Atos também foram realizados em cidades do noroeste paulista como Catanduva, São José do Rio Preto, Araçatuba e Andradina. Lá, os magistrados se vestiram de preto como sinal de luto pela aprovação das medidas. Em São Carlos e Araraquara, cerca de 80 pessoas fizeram manifestações em oposição ao novo texto.
Votação na Câmara
Depois de mais de sete horas de sessão, os deputados desfiguraram o pacote que reúne um conjunto de medidas de combate à corrupção propostas pelo Ministério Público Federal e avalizadas por mais de 2 milhões de assinaturas de cidadãos encaminhadas ao Congresso Nacional.
O texto foi aprovado pela Câmara na madrugada desta quarta-feira (30). Com a aprovação, o projeto segue agora para análise do Senado.
Ao longo da madrugada, os deputados aprovaram diversas modificações no texto que saiu da comissão especial. Diversas propostas foram rejeitadas e outros temas polêmicos foram incluídos. Das dez medidas originais, somente quatro passaram, ainda assim parcialmente.
O texto original do pacote anticorrupção tinha dez medidas e foi apresentado pelo Ministério Público Federal . Na comissão especial da Câmara que analisou o tema, uma parte das sugestões dos procuradores da República foi desmembrada e outras, incorporadas ao parecer do relator Onyx Lorenzoni (DEM-RS). As discussões foram acompanhadas pelo Ministério Público, que deu o seu aval ao texto construído.
Segundo o relator, do texto original, só permaneceram as medidas de transparência a serem adotadas por tribunais, a criminalização do caixa 2, o agravamento de penas para corrupção e a limitação do uso de recursos com o fim de atrasar processos.

==//==


Operation Carwash Task Force: Anti-Corruption Award winners 2016
Descrição: Transparency International
3.625
55.406 visualizações
  •  
·  ·  ·  ·  ·  ·  ·  ·  ·  ·  ·  ·  Início em:
Publicado em 3 de dez de 2016
The Carwash Operation (Operação Lava Jato) began as a local money laundering investigation and has grown into the largest investigation in Brazil. The state prosecutors from the Carwash Task Force have been on the front line of investigations in Brazil since April 2014. Dealing with one of the world’s biggest corruption scandals, the Petrobras case, they have investigated, prosecuted, and obtained heavy sentences against some of the most powerful members of Brazil’s economic and political elites.

The Operation Carwash Task Force won Transparency International's Anti-Corruption Award in 2016.
Comentários • 3
Descrição: GILBERTO MARTINS BORGES
Adicionar um comentário público...
Descrição: Ney Sampaio
Poderiam também fazer vídeos em Português, principalmente quando se trata de um assunto tão importante quanto esse! Falo em relação aos dados apresentados!
4
Descrição: documentaryondemand
fizeram olhe no canal deles ae
1
Descrição: Marcelo Rosses
Esse tipo de coisa que faz o brasileiro ter esperança de um país melhor
5
Descrição: mikaele s.m
Parabéns, a toda a força tarefa da Lava Jato!
3
Descrição: Robert Serbinenko
Em portugues para que não reste dúvidas para os desavisados brasileros: " E tem gente que vai perder seu domingo para ir às ruas protestar contra a Lei de Responsabilidade para os membros do Judiciário e do Ministério Público. O corporativismo hermético que emoldura o Judiciário brasileiro, mais escancarado no Brasil Pós Golpe, transforma esse segmento em super brasileiros acima das Leis e da Constituição., inclusive percebendo salários estratosféricos, acima do limite constitucional. Hoje você apoia essa medida ilegal, amanhã pode ser vítima dessa casta privilegiada, a famosa turma da "carteirada" ou do "sabe com quem está falando?""
Descrição: Ares Vicious
Petralha,escória,parasita,faça um favor à nação e se mata
Descrição: Ales Sandro
"Brasil Pós Golpe". Bom, isso mostra seu caráter e que tudo que você fala sobre "Não sou PT" ou "Não sou mortadela" é apenas o famoso "Tenho vergonha de admitir que votei em uma quadrilha igual o PMDB e PSDB, que é o PT". Mas entendo, Robert, o orgulho seu impede de ver a realidade, ainda mais quando a critica não é contra a Lei de Responsabilidade mas sim a forma que colocaram, aonde deixaram interpretação aberta para eles conseguirem enquadrar quem quiser, mas o abuso de autoridade por político não te incomoda, né? Ainda mais quando quem mais vota contra a Lava Jato são os "santos" do PT e os "golpistas" do PMDB, ei, pera lá, como assim PT, PSDB e PMDB unidos, não era golpe? Ixi, algo errado nesse seu raciocínio. Em resumo Robert, não sei se você é coxinha ou mortadela, o que sei que você está apenas espalhando o discurso mentiroso que ambas as partes ja usaram em algum momento, em resumo, você é apenas mais um na massa de manobra.
2
Descrição: Mario Fontes
You should ask the 20 millions unemployed if they agree with the ward
Descrição: Marcelo reis alves
o pessoal enaltece moro com justiça mas DELTAN É SIMPLESMENTE GENIAL
Descrição: Felipe Nogueira
Congratulations #MPF #JF #PF
Descrição: SNAPY Surfboards
Bravissimo!!
Descrição: Alessandra Lopes
Verdadeiro orgulho dos juízes, MPF e PF! Vcs são um exemplo para as futuras gerações! Deus os abençoe e protejam!!!
Descrição: Mario Fontes
As companhias americanas de infra-estrutura e as irmãs do Petróleo estão de acordo c o Prêmio. Será que os 20 milhões de despregados e crescentes estão?
Descrição: Robert Serbinenko
Mais para os desvisados: Na Espanha existe lei de abuso de autoridade e lá onde juiz grampeou ilegalmente políticos, sem divulgar grampos para um Jornal Nacional, ganhou 11 anos de suspensão do cargo sem salários e aqui o que acontece com juízes? No máximo aposentadoria compulsória de 30 mil reais/mês mais benefícios. http://falandoverdades.com.br/2016/09/27/na-espanha-juiz-que-usou-grampo-ilegal-para-pegar-politicos-foi-interditado-por-11-anos/
1
Descrição: Jocimar Barbosa
Mas existe lei aqui no pais, e ela pune grampo ilegal anulando a investigação e ate gerando prisão pra juiz, acontece que como em casos de corrupção ela não é aplicada. E sinto muito informar ao esquerdalhinha, Lula não foi "grampeado" ilegalmente como a corja defeca pela boca em todos lugares.
4
Descrição: Mauricio Filho
O PT para eles foi ilegal agora o GRAMPO ilegal daquele ministro comunista CALERO contra o presidente é legal são doentes e psicopatas.
1
Descrição: Rosario akino
Acho que o chororô do lula na ONU , não deu certo....
Descrição: cfmvl
CONGRATULATIONS TO THE CARWASH TASK FORCE FOR THEIR BRAVERY AND PERSEVERANCE TO FACE THE DARK POWER OF CORRUPTION OF THE CONGRESS IN BRAZIL. RENAN CALHEIROS OUT. LULA AND THE WHOLE GANG OF PT IN JAIL.
Descrição: Mario Fontes
Bom lembrar que as companhias de Petróleo e Infra-estrutura americana trabalham em conjunto com a Cia promovendo assassinatos e guerras p obter contratos
1
Descrição: Felipe Nogueira
MARIO FONTES SPAMMER Communist. CALA A BOCA SEU OTÁRIO.
Descrição: Adailton Vieira
Não sou contra a lava jato , mas concordo que as leis é para todos independente das funções. que exerce. Talvez muito que estão aqui, questionando essa PL, nunca viu ou assistiu um abuso de poder . Recentemente um juiz foi multado por uma guarda municipal , alem de ser autoritário ganhou um processo com valor acima de 10mil reais da guarda alegando que houve desacato a autoridade , ao dizer que ele não era dono do mundo. Mesmo ele estando errado. Outros casos como pessoas que passaram anos na cadeia e depois descobrem que a mesma foi condenada erradamente . Nesse casa o povo paga duas vezes , um como preso e outra para indenizar a vitima do erro do MP e juízes. Sem falar naquela palavrinha que eles não gostam (corporativismo). Quanto a lava jato admiro o Sergio Mora mas ele cometeu algumas arbitrariedade apoiado pelo STF, que ao perceber o excesso puxou-lhe as rédeas.
1
Descrição: 50 tons de Rose
Parabéns aos envolvidos! E Lava Jato forever,porque no Brasil a corrupção não tem fiiiiiiiimmmmm.
1
Reprodução automática
Próximo
Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TXJBpG5Ej8U/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=fitvBeiLg5CMEawDfyPjUPGeRCE10:28





Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/j_1O1Dw-y10/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=simVHUr6-WdFi9jfAtjrfGmmFGo22:02

Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/hioiNywAZBQ/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=JIjBdLZ-zSG9KkQCRubZRVotdYw6:40

Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/80LswkAnOGo/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=N2VkGOXLVAEx7zLTxvWqG_Cao5Y6:04

Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JI1Pdlq97tc/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=BJ2r5K7yKjmlPryCBj5mKCpL9Ss4:18
Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cy2GqLuGTv0/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=9GB_-WTTRSlTcvWuL41b6dzxH7o10:00
Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/24nXW5rIa_8/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=IfcLbMpTm_Q0IVwnMrn6YV2d7uI8:07
Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1iCANH0eb4o/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=itBCy3KK-TFPJQdSHTzVCDuntIE5:04
Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bPNWuQQ_z68/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=HO7Y1HhjLjMeUAO7-tyIN8b5YWA19:31
Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JA4TYSST2I4/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=2P3OxxpMABtEQbudZ1ouwqqswWU7:21
Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1gFbMHzgF5U/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=r3cILnKviAdZ_VFZ2PsFkzXT6e03:00
Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eYYz4FsdO6o/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=QWKen6XGIu9dUx0t8Vo0Wvorq9E5:29
Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MVpcPMERlpA/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=k_-69gv2CU7u8GYQxU3BZykRP6c2:27
Descrição: https://s.ytimg.com/yts/img/pixel-vfl3z5WfW.gif4:00
Descrição: https://s.ytimg.com/yts/img/pixel-vfl3z5WfW.gif4:04
Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/FpOSOdYQLbA/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=foXIgg4l-d-M-LFb0UOcePBgKL43:28
Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/44EFa4qO7rk/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=jLlqOj6DyIrv7XNRqSr-F4fd30c5:42
Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/X_ssq7op00U/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=OUsqnz-z3z-oGGU11-mCCksZr0I5:34
Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xT5ckT3BFdw/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=sJdRmmwA5Z9TI_tGeBCJdLs1Pxc5:42
Descrição: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Rypy6MJTGos/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=168&h=94&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=MhmxwLG3Z7BXhSw--GbPLy9PJXA1:55
· 
  •  
·  ·  Histórico
==//==


Parte superior do formulário
Donation amount
  • €50
  • €100
  • €500
  • €1000
Parte inferior do formulário
Parte superior do formulário
Search:
Parte inferior do formulário
3 December 2016 · Transparency International Secretariat

Translations:
PT   ES  
Brazil’s Carwash Task Force wins Transparency International Anti-Corruption Award
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Transparency International today proudly announces that the Carwash Task Force (Força-Tarefa Lava Jato) of Brazil has been selected as the winner of the 2016 Anti-Corruption Award.

The Carwash Operation (Operação Lava Jato) began as a local money laundering investigation and has grown into the largest investigation to date uncovering cases of state capture and corruption in Brazil.
The state prosecutors from the Carwash Task Force have been on the front line of investigations in Brazil since April 2014. Dealing with one of the world’s biggest corruption scandals, the Petrobras case, they have investigated, prosecuted, and obtained heavy sentences against some of the most powerful members of Brazil’s economic and political elites. To date, there have been more than 240 criminal charges and 118 convictions totalling 1,256 years of jail time, including high-level politicians and businesspeople previously considered untouchable.
With their national campaign “10 Measures against Corruption”, they pushed for legislative reforms to enhance the capacity of public administrators to prevent and detect corruption, and law enforcers to investigate, prosecute and sanction it.
On 30 November, Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies voted for a weakened version of the law. The lawmakers took out essential features on whistleblower protection and illegal campaign financing and introduced an amendment that opens the door to prosecute judges and prosecutors for liability offence. In extreme cases, carrying out their normal functions could be interpreted as being unlawful according to subjective criteria. The new version risks the independence of judges and prosecutors.
The Senate has yet to vote on the legislation and already protests have started to reverse the changes made to the original 10 Measures against Corruption.
“Billions of dollars have been lost to corruption in Brazil, and Brazilians have had enough of the corruption that is ravaging their country. The Carwash Task Force is doing great work in ensuring the corrupt, no matter how powerful they are, are held to account and that justice is served,” said Mercedes de Freitas, Chair of Transparency’s International Anti-Corruption Award Committee. “We are pleased to award the Brazilian prosecutors behind the Carwash Task Force with the 2016 Anti-Corruption Award for their relentless efforts to end endemic corruption in Brazil.”
The Anti-Corruption Award honours remarkable individuals and organisations worldwide, journalists, prosecutors, government officials, and civil society leaders who expose and fight corruption.
The ongoing Carwash Operation has triggered additional criminal investigations and proceedings in other sectors and is recognised as a landmark for white-collar criminal prosecution and defence in Brazil. The investigations have gained traction and huge popular support on both national and international levels.
The prosecutors from the Carwash Task Force are the second Brazilian awardees since the launch of Transparency International’s awards in 2000 after the whistleblower Luis Roberto Mesquita who received an Integrity Award in 2002.
Transparency International received 580 nominations for 136 individuals for the 2016 Anti-Corruption Award, reinforcing our belief that there is a need to celebrate the many heroes of the fight against corruption. Nominations for this year’s award were submitted by the public and Transparency International chapters around the world. The jury for the award is a committee of 8 individuals from across the world who have been active in the anti-corruption movement for many years. Past winners include corruption fighting journalists, activists and government officials.

The Carwash Task Force will receive the award later today during the
17th International Anti-Corruption Conference in Panama City.
Press contact(s):
Natalie Baharav
T: +507 64578869
E:
press@transparency.org
Follow us on Social Media
  • Descrição: https://www.transparency.org/assets/images/responsive/social-icons/facebook.png
  • Descrição: https://www.transparency.org/assets/images/responsive/social-icons/twitter.png
  • Descrição: https://www.transparency.org/assets/images/responsive/social-icons/youtube.png
  • Descrição: https://www.transparency.org/assets/images/responsive/social-icons/linkedin.png
  • Descrição: https://www.transparency.org/assets/images/responsive/social-icons/gplus.png
  • Descrição: https://www.transparency.org/assets/images/responsive/social-icons/flickr.png
  • Descrição: https://www.transparency.org/assets/images/responsive/social-icons/rss.png
Subscribe to our newsletters
Parte superior do formulário
Parte inferior do formulário
Parte superior do formulário
  • Daily corruption news
  • TI Press release
  • Chapter press releases
  • Features
  • Publications
  • Jobs and Tenders
  • Helpdesk answers (Anti-corruption briefs)
Parte inferior do formulário
About us
Research
Focus areas
News and media
Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0
© Transparency International 2016. Some rights reserved.
1




THE END